Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Handle cgroup_disable=memory when getting memcg protection

2019-02-28 Thread Chris Down
Andrew Morton writes: Things settled down. Here's the rolled-up patch. Please review? Looks correct to me as patch author, thanks!

Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Handle cgroup_disable=memory when getting memcg protection

2019-02-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 08:48:09 +0100 Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 01-02-19 08:12:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 31-01-19 23:57:11, Chris Down wrote: > > > memcg is NULL if we have CONFIG_MEMCG set, but cgroup_disable=memory on > > > the kernel command line. > > > > > > Fixes: 8a907cdf0177ab40 (

Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Handle cgroup_disable=memory when getting memcg protection

2019-01-31 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 01-02-19 08:12:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 31-01-19 23:57:11, Chris Down wrote: > > memcg is NULL if we have CONFIG_MEMCG set, but cgroup_disable=memory on > > the kernel command line. > > > > Fixes: 8a907cdf0177ab40 ("mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaim") > > JFYI this i

Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Handle cgroup_disable=memory when getting memcg protection

2019-01-31 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 31-01-19 23:57:11, Chris Down wrote: > memcg is NULL if we have CONFIG_MEMCG set, but cgroup_disable=memory on > the kernel command line. > > Fixes: 8a907cdf0177ab40 ("mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaim") JFYI this is not a valid sha1. It is from linux next and it will change

[PATCH] mm, memcg: Handle cgroup_disable=memory when getting memcg protection

2019-01-31 Thread Chris Down
memcg is NULL if we have CONFIG_MEMCG set, but cgroup_disable=memory on the kernel command line. Fixes: 8a907cdf0177ab40 ("mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaim") Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Chris Down Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kerne