On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 21:36 -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:01 PM Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > There is an imbalance between when slab_pre_alloc_hook calls
> > memcg_kmem_get_cache and when slab_post_alloc_hook calls
> > memcg_kmem_put_cache.
> >
>
> Can you explain how
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:36 PM Shakeel Butt wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:01 PM Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > There is an imbalance between when slab_pre_alloc_hook calls
> > memcg_kmem_get_cache and when slab_post_alloc_hook calls
> > memcg_kmem_put_cache.
> >
>
> Can you explain how there
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:01 PM Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> There is an imbalance between when slab_pre_alloc_hook calls
> memcg_kmem_get_cache and when slab_post_alloc_hook calls
> memcg_kmem_put_cache.
>
Can you explain how there is an imbalance? If the returned kmem cache
from
There is an imbalance between when slab_pre_alloc_hook calls
memcg_kmem_get_cache and when slab_post_alloc_hook calls
memcg_kmem_put_cache.
This can cause a memcg kmem cache to be destroyed right as
an object from that cache is being allocated, which is probably
not good. It could lead to things
4 matches
Mail list logo