> - I don't think it's necessarily "system stability". The problem with
> large amounts of highmem ends up being that we end up using up almost
> all of the lowmem just to *track* the huge amount of highmem, and then
> we have so little lowmem that we suck at performance and have various
> random
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> Here's a somewhat friendlier one. Printing out the total amount of
> memory in the system may give them some extra motivation to upgrade
> to a 64 bit kernel :)
This needs more work:
- suggesting a 64-bit kernel on a truly 32-bit CPU is in
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Loup A. Griffais
On 05/01/2013 07:46 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2013 21:34:26 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:48:17PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
It could also print out a friendly message, to
inform the user they should upgrade to a 64 b
On Wed, 1 May 2013 21:34:26 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:48:17PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > It could also print out a friendly message, to
> > inform the user they should upgrade to a 64 bit
> > kernel to enjoy the use of all of their memory.
>
> Oh, oh, oh!!!
4 matches
Mail list logo