On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >>diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> >>index c4b85d0..79a0f33 100644
> >>--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> >>+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> >>@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static struct inode *hugetlbfs_alloc_inode(struct
> >>super_block *sb)
> >>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:09:10AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:03:04AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>From: Wanpeng Li
>>
>>When kmem_cache_alloc fails alloc slab object from
>>hugetlbfs_inode_cachep, return -ENOMEM in usual. But
>>hugetlbfs_alloc_inode implementation has
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:03:04AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>From: Wanpeng Li
>
>When kmem_cache_alloc fails alloc slab object from
>hugetlbfs_inode_cachep, return -ENOMEM in usual. But
>hugetlbfs_alloc_inode implementation has inconsitency
>with it and returns NULL. Fix it to return -ENOMEM.
>
From: Wanpeng Li
When kmem_cache_alloc fails alloc slab object from
hugetlbfs_inode_cachep, return -ENOMEM in usual. But
hugetlbfs_alloc_inode implementation has inconsitency
with it and returns NULL. Fix it to return -ENOMEM.
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li
---
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c |2 +-
1
From: Wanpeng Li l...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
When kmem_cache_alloc fails alloc slab object from
hugetlbfs_inode_cachep, return -ENOMEM in usual. But
hugetlbfs_alloc_inode implementation has inconsitency
with it and returns NULL. Fix it to return -ENOMEM.
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:03:04AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Wanpeng Li l...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
When kmem_cache_alloc fails alloc slab object from
hugetlbfs_inode_cachep, return -ENOMEM in usual. But
hugetlbfs_alloc_inode implementation has inconsitency
with it and returns NULL. Fix it to
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:09:10AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:03:04AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Wanpeng Li l...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
When kmem_cache_alloc fails alloc slab object from
hugetlbfs_inode_cachep, return -ENOMEM in usual. But
hugetlbfs_alloc_inode
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Wanpeng Li wrote:
diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
index c4b85d0..79a0f33 100644
--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static struct inode *hugetlbfs_alloc_inode(struct
super_block *sb)
p =
8 matches
Mail list logo