On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> > > index 71b11d9..6af873a 100644
> > > --- a/mm/memblock.c
> > > +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> > > @@ -707,11 +707,9 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx,
> > > int nid,
> > > stru
On 12/27/2013 01:45 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 71b11d9..6af873a 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -707,11 +707,9 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int
nid,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 71b11d9..6af873a 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -707,11 +707,9 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int
> nid,
> struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblo
From: Grygorii Strashko
Check nid parameter and produce warning if it has deprecated MAX_NUMNODES
value. Also re-assign NUMA_NO_NODE value to the nid parameter in this case.
These will help to identify the wrong API usage (the caller) and make code
simpler.
Cc: Yinghai Lu
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: An
4 matches
Mail list logo