On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 7:00 PM Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > I don't know why this was addressed to me in particular (easy to imagine
> > I've made a mod at some time that bears on this, but I haven't found it);
> > but have spent longer considering the patc
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 7:00 PM Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> I don't know why this was addressed to me in particular (easy to imagine
> I've made a mod at some time that bears on this, but I haven't found it);
> but have spent longer considering the patch than I should have done -
> apologies to everyon
I don't know why this was addressed to me in particular (easy to imagine
I've made a mod at some time that bears on this, but I haven't found it);
but have spent longer considering the patch than I should have done -
apologies to everyone else I should be replying to.
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020, Shakeel B
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:19:28PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Since the commit 369ea8242c0f ("mm/rmap: update to new mmu_notifier
> semantic v2"), the code to check the secondary MMU's page table access
> bit is broken for !(TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS) because the page is unmapped from
> the secondary MMU
Since the commit 369ea8242c0f ("mm/rmap: update to new mmu_notifier
semantic v2"), the code to check the secondary MMU's page table access
bit is broken for !(TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS) because the page is unmapped from
the secondary MMU's page table before the check. More specifically for
those secondary
5 matches
Mail list logo