On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:20:55AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 07-10-16 14:14:01, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:02:00AM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
> > > It was my (limited) understanding that the subsequent 2 patch set
> > > superseded this patch. Indeed, the 2 patch se
On Fri 07-10-16 14:14:01, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:02:00AM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
> > It was my (limited) understanding that the subsequent 2 patch set
> > superseded this patch. Indeed, the 2 patch set seems to solve
> > both the SLAB and SLUB bug reports.
>
> It would
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:02:00AM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
> It was my (limited) understanding that the subsequent 2 patch set
> superseded this patch. Indeed, the 2 patch set seems to solve
> both the SLAB and SLUB bug reports.
It would mean that patch 1 solves both the SLAB and SLUB bug repo
It was my (limited) understanding that the subsequent 2 patch set
superseded this patch. Indeed, the 2 patch set seems to solve
both the SLAB and SLUB bug reports.
References:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172981
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172991
https://patchwork.k
From: Joonsoo Kim
There is a bug report that SLAB makes extreme load average due to
over 2000 kworker thread.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172981
This issue is caused by kmemcg feature that try to create new set of
kmem_caches for each memcg. Recently, kmem_cache creation is slow
5 matches
Mail list logo