Would like to retracting the ack after seeing the other comments. Will ack
after then issues have been fixed.
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
>
> > printk is meant to be used with an associated log level. There are some
> > instances o
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
> printk is meant to be used with an associated log level. There are some
> instances of printk scattered around the mm code where the log level is
> missing. Add a log level and adhere to suggestions by
> scripts/checkpatch.pl by moving to the pr_* ma
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 16:49 -0700, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
> printk is meant to be used with an associated log level. There are some
> instances of printk scattered around the mm code where the log level is
> missing. Add a log level and adhere to suggestions by
> scripts/checkpatch.pl by moving t
printk is meant to be used with an associated log level. There are some
instances of printk scattered around the mm code where the log level is
missing. Add a log level and adhere to suggestions by
scripts/checkpatch.pl by moving to the pr_* macros.
Signed-off-by: Mitchel Humpherys
---
mm/bounce
4 matches
Mail list logo