On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Naoya Horiguchi
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:49:37PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:36:40PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
>> > Hi Jerome,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:43:24AM -0400, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > > From: Je
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:49:37PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:36:40PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > Hi Jerome,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:43:24AM -0400, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Jerome Glisse
> > >
> > > Prior to this copy_one_pte will never
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:36:40PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:43:24AM -0400, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Jerome Glisse
> >
> > Prior to this copy_one_pte will never reach the special swap file
> > handling code because swap_duplicate will re
Hi Jerome,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:43:24AM -0400, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse
>
> Prior to this copy_one_pte will never reach the special swap file
> handling code because swap_duplicate will return invalid value.
>
> Note this is not fatal so nothing bad ever happen beca
From: Jerome Glisse
Prior to this copy_one_pte will never reach the special swap file
handling code because swap_duplicate will return invalid value.
Note this is not fatal so nothing bad ever happen because of that.
Reason is that copy_pte_range would break of its loop and call
add_swap_count_c
5 matches
Mail list logo