On 08/13/2015 04:40 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 11:13 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Given that this apparently isn't the first case of this localhost issue,
I wonder if network code should just clear skb->pfmemalloc during send
(or maybe just send over localhost). That would b
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 11:13 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Given that this apparently isn't the first case of this localhost issue,
> I wonder if network code should just clear skb->pfmemalloc during send
> (or maybe just send over localhost). That would be probably easier than
> distinguish t
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:58:54AM +0200, mho...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> The patch c48a11c7ad26 ("netvm: propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb")
> added the checks for page->pfmemalloc to __skb_fill_page_desc():
>
> if (page->pfmemalloc && !page->mapping)
>
On Thu 13-08-15 11:13:04, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 08/13/2015 10:58 AM, mho...@kernel.org wrote:
> >From: Michal Hocko
> >
> >The patch c48a11c7ad26 ("netvm: propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb")
> >added the checks for page->pfmemalloc to __skb_fill_page_desc():
> >
> > if (page->pfmemal
On 08/13/2015 10:58 AM, mho...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Michal Hocko
The patch c48a11c7ad26 ("netvm: propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb")
added the checks for page->pfmemalloc to __skb_fill_page_desc():
if (page->pfmemalloc && !page->mapping)
skb->pfmemalloc = true;
It
From: Michal Hocko
The patch c48a11c7ad26 ("netvm: propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb")
added the checks for page->pfmemalloc to __skb_fill_page_desc():
if (page->pfmemalloc && !page->mapping)
skb->pfmemalloc = true;
It assumes page->mapping == NULL implies that page->pfm
6 matches
Mail list logo