On Wed 23-05-18 16:08:28, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Shakeel,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help im
Hi Shakeel,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:41 PM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 05/16/2018 10:20 PM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > ___GFP_COLD and ___GFP_OTHER_NODE were removed but their bits were
> > stranded. Slide existing gfp masks to make those two bits available.
> Well, there are already available for hypothetical
On Wed 16-05-18 13:20:23, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> ___GFP_COLD and ___GFP_OTHER_NODE were removed but their bits were
> stranded. Slide existing gfp masks to make those two bits available.
Could you make the patch a bit smaller smaller? E.g.
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
ind
On 05/16/2018 10:20 PM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> ___GFP_COLD and ___GFP_OTHER_NODE were removed but their bits were
> stranded. Slide existing gfp masks to make those two bits available.
Well, there are already available for hypothetical new flags. Is there
anything that benefits from a smaller __GFP
___GFP_COLD and ___GFP_OTHER_NODE were removed but their bits were
stranded. Slide existing gfp masks to make those two bits available.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt
---
include/linux/gfp.h | 42 +-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --g
6 matches
Mail list logo