Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit

2016-04-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:46:09 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote: > We have been reclaimed highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit > but [1] changed the behavior so it doesn't reclaim highmem zone > although buffer_heads is over the limit. > This patch restores the logic. > > [1] commit 6b4f7799c6a5 ("mm

Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit

2016-04-03 Thread Minchan Kim
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:14:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:03:50 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Fri 01-04-16 17:00:58, Minchan Kim wrote: > > [...] > > > [2] commit 5acbd3bfc93b ("mm, oom: rework oom detection") > > > > I didn't look a tht patch yet but wanted to

[PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit

2016-04-03 Thread Minchan Kim
We have been reclaimed highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit but [1] changed the behavior so it doesn't reclaim highmem zone although buffer_heads is over the limit. This patch restores the logic. [1] commit 6b4f7799c6a5 ("mm: vmscan: invoke slab shrinkers from shrink_zone()") Cc: Johannes W

Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit

2016-04-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:03:50 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 01-04-16 17:00:58, Minchan Kim wrote: > [...] > > [2] commit 5acbd3bfc93b ("mm, oom: rework oom detection") > > I didn't look a tht patch yet but wanted to note that this sha is most > probably from linux-next and won't be stable. Al

Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit

2016-04-01 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 01-04-16 17:00:58, Minchan Kim wrote: [...] > [2] commit 5acbd3bfc93b ("mm, oom: rework oom detection") I didn't look a tht patch yet but wanted to note that this sha is most probably from linux-next and won't be stable. Also this patch will most likely see some changes in future so making

[PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit

2016-04-01 Thread Minchan Kim
We have been reclaimed highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit but [1] changed the behavior so it doesn't reclaim highmem zone although buffer_heads is over the limit. This patch restores the logic. As well, [2] removed classzone_idx so we don't need code related to it. This patch cleans it up.