On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Konstantin Dorfman
wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:19:01 +0200, Per Forlin
> wrote:
> Hello Per,
>
>>I would like to start with some basic comments.
>>
>>1. Is this read sequential issue specific to MMC?
>>2. Or is it common with all other block-drivers that gets
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:19:01 +0200, Per Forlin
wrote:
Hello Per,
>I would like to start with some basic comments.
>
>1. Is this read sequential issue specific to MMC?
>2. Or is it common with all other block-drivers that gets data from
>the block layer (SCSI/SATA etc) ?
>If (#2) can the issue be
Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for addressing this issue. I have just started to look at this
patch and I haven't got into the details yet.
I would like to start with some basic comments.
1. Is this read sequential issue specific to MMC?
2. Or is it common with all other block-drivers that gets data from
The main assumption of the async request design is that the file
system adds block requests to the block device queue asynchronously
without waiting for completion (see the Rationale section of
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Specs
/StoragePerfMMC-async-req).
We found out that in case
4 matches
Mail list logo