Tom Rini writes:
> On 05/01/2013 07:18 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 04/30/2013 10:19 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Tom Rini writes:
On 04/28/2013 10:59 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Tom Rini writes:
>
>> Recent gcc's may place functions into the .text.unlikely section and we
>> nee
On 05/01/2013 07:18 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 04/30/2013 10:19 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Tom Rini writes:
>>> On 04/28/2013 10:59 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Tom Rini writes:
> Recent gcc's may place functions into the .text.unlikely section and we
> need to check this section as
On 04/30/2013 10:19 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Tom Rini writes:
>> On 04/28/2013 10:59 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Tom Rini writes:
>>>
Recent gcc's may place functions into the .text.unlikely section and we
need to check this section as well for section mismatches now otherwise
w
Tom Rini writes:
> On 04/28/2013 10:59 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Tom Rini writes:
>>
>>> Recent gcc's may place functions into the .text.unlikely section and we
>>> need to check this section as well for section mismatches now otherwise
>>> we may have false negatives for this test.
>>
>> Hmm
On 04/28/2013 10:59 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Tom Rini writes:
>
>> Recent gcc's may place functions into the .text.unlikely section and we
>> need to check this section as well for section mismatches now otherwise
>> we may have false negatives for this test.
>
> Hmm, I don't think it's all th
Tom Rini writes:
> Recent gcc's may place functions into the .text.unlikely section and we
> need to check this section as well for section mismatches now otherwise
> we may have false negatives for this test.
Hmm, I don't think it's all that recent, is it? I can find it back to
gcc 4.0.4:
`-f
Recent gcc's may place functions into the .text.unlikely section and we
need to check this section as well for section mismatches now otherwise
we may have false negatives for this test.
Cc: Rusty Russell
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kbu...@vger.kernel.org
Si
7 matches
Mail list logo