Dave Jones writes:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:12:55PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On which, we should probably do this.
> >
> > ---
> > Subject: module: Replace over-engineered nested sleep
> >
> > Since the introduction of the nested sleep warning; we've established
> > that the
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:12:55PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On which, we should probably do this.
>
> ---
> Subject: module: Replace over-engineered nested sleep
>
> Since the introduction of the nested sleep warning; we've established
> that the occasional sleep inside a
On which, we should probably do this.
---
Subject: module: Replace over-engineered nested sleep
Since the introduction of the nested sleep warning; we've established
that the occasional sleep inside a wait_event() is fine.
wait_event() loops are invariant wrt. spurious wakeups, and the
Because wait_event() loops are safe vs spurious wakeups we can allow the
occasional sleep -- which ends up being very similar.
Cc: Rusty Russell
Reported-by: Dave Jones
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
---
kernel/module.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:12:55PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On which, we should probably do this.
---
Subject: module: Replace over-engineered nested sleep
Since the introduction of the nested sleep warning; we've established
that the occasional sleep inside a wait_event() is
Because wait_event() loops are safe vs spurious wakeups we can allow the
occasional sleep -- which ends up being very similar.
Cc: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
Reported-by: Dave Jones da...@codemonkey.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) pet...@infradead.org
---
kernel/module.c |
On which, we should probably do this.
---
Subject: module: Replace over-engineered nested sleep
Since the introduction of the nested sleep warning; we've established
that the occasional sleep inside a wait_event() is fine.
wait_event() loops are invariant wrt. spurious wakeups, and the
Dave Jones da...@codemonkey.org.uk writes:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:12:55PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On which, we should probably do this.
---
Subject: module: Replace over-engineered nested sleep
Since the introduction of the nested sleep warning; we've established
8 matches
Mail list logo
