Hi Gustavo,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote on Tue, 7 May 2019
10:59:38 -0500:
> On 5/7/19 10:49 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for this, Richard:
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git/log/?h=mtd%2Fnext&qt=grep&q=fall-through
>
On 5/7/19 10:49 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for this, Richard:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git/log/?h=mtd%2Fnext&qt=grep&q=fall-through
>>
>> There are only two of these warnings left to be addressed in
>> MTD[1]:
>>
>>
; , "linux-kernel"
> , "Kees Cook"
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Mai 2019 16:54:12
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] mtd: cfi_util: mark expected switch fall-throughs
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks a lot for this, Richard:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for this, Richard:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git/log/?h=mtd%2Fnext&qt=grep&q=fall-through
There are only two of these warnings left to be addressed in
MTD[1]:
> @@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct
mtd_in
Hi Miquel,
On 4/16/19 12:24 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote on Mon, 15 Apr
> 2019 07:57:11 -0500:
>
>> Hi Miquel,
>>
>> On 4/15/19 3:44 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>> Hi Gustavo,
>>>
>>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote on Wed, 10 Apr
>>> 2019 16:16:51 -0500:
>>
Hi Gustavo,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote on Mon, 15 Apr
2019 07:57:11 -0500:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On 4/15/19 3:44 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Gustavo,
> >
> > "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote on Wed, 10 Apr
> > 2019 16:16:51 -0500:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> If no one cares I'll add this to my t
Hi Miquel,
On 4/15/19 3:44 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote on Wed, 10 Apr
> 2019 16:16:51 -0500:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If no one cares I'll add this to my tree for 5.2.
>
> Which tree are you talking about?
>
This one:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux
Hi Gustavo,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote on Wed, 10 Apr
2019 16:16:51 -0500:
> Hi all,
>
> If no one cares I'll add this to my tree for 5.2.
Which tree are you talking about?
Please let the MTD maintainers take patches through their tree. We
might be late but this is definitely not a good reas
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:02 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
>
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>
> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.c: In function ‘cfi_build_cmd’:
> drivers/mtd/ch
Hi all,
If no one cares I'll add this to my tree for 5.2.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/20/19 3:20 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Friendly ping:
>
> Who can take this?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 2/8/19 12:02 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit
On 3/20/19 6:25 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2019, 22:23:21 CET schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
>> So, if this is too much of a burden for people, I can add all these
>> MTD patches to my own tree for 5.2.
>
> Taking the patches via MTD is not a big deal, let's go that pat
Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2019, 22:23:21 CET schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
> So, if this is too much of a burden for people, I can add all these
> MTD patches to my own tree for 5.2.
Taking the patches via MTD is not a big deal, let's go that path.
For you it is more work to send many patches and getti
On 3/20/19 4:05 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2019, 21:20:51 CET schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Friendly ping:
>>
>> Who can take this?
>
> Hmmm, for MTD I think we can schedule these patches for the next merge window.
> But I'm not sure whether t
Hi!
Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2019, 21:20:51 CET schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
> Hi all,
>
> Friendly ping:
>
> Who can take this?
Hmmm, for MTD I think we can schedule these patches for the next merge window.
But I'm not sure whether these comments are a good solution.
I much more prefer the compil
Hi all,
Friendly ping:
Who can take this?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 2/8/19 12:02 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>
> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_ut
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.c: In function ‘cfi_build_cmd’:
drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.c:110:10: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplic
16 matches
Mail list logo
