Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: scale up timeout for full-chip erase

2015-09-29 Thread Brian Norris
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:59:17PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > From: Furquan Shaikh > > This patch fixes timeout issues seen on large NOR flash (e.g., 16MB > w25q128fw) when using ioctl(MEMERASE) with offset=0 and length=16M. The > input parameters matter because spi_nor_erase() uses a

Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: scale up timeout for full-chip erase

2015-09-29 Thread Brian Norris
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:59:17PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > From: Furquan Shaikh > > This patch fixes timeout issues seen on large NOR flash (e.g., 16MB > w25q128fw) when using ioctl(MEMERASE) with offset=0 and length=16M. The > input parameters matter because

[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: scale up timeout for full-chip erase

2015-09-18 Thread Brian Norris
From: Furquan Shaikh This patch fixes timeout issues seen on large NOR flash (e.g., 16MB w25q128fw) when using ioctl(MEMERASE) with offset=0 and length=16M. The input parameters matter because spi_nor_erase() uses a different code path for full-chip erase, where we use the SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE

[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: scale up timeout for full-chip erase

2015-09-18 Thread Brian Norris
From: Furquan Shaikh This patch fixes timeout issues seen on large NOR flash (e.g., 16MB w25q128fw) when using ioctl(MEMERASE) with offset=0 and length=16M. The input parameters matter because spi_nor_erase() uses a different code path for full-chip erase, where we use the