From: Gao feng
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:33:23 +0800
> Please see my patch in this thread, I think it's a better way to fix this bug.
You'll need to work that out with Eric, fwiw I think his patch was
clean and just fine and it's staying in my tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
于 2012年07月10日 05:51, David Miller 写道:
> From: Gao feng
> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:15:29 +0800
>
>> 于 2012年07月09日 15:45, Eric Dumazet 写道:
>>> From: Eric Dumazet
>>>
>>> dev->priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
>>> update_netdev_tables().
>>> And this is only called if
From: Gao feng
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:15:29 +0800
> 于 2012年07月09日 15:45, Eric Dumazet 写道:
>> From: Eric Dumazet
>>
>> dev->priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
>> update_netdev_tables().
>> And this is only called if write_priomap() is called.
>>
>> But if
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:40:25PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 08:13 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:50:52PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao.
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 08:13 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:50:52PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao. Just to be sure (I asked in the
> > > previous
> > > thread), would it be
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:50:52PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> > Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao. Just to be sure (I asked in the
> > previous
> > thread), would it be better to avoid the length check in skb_update_prio,
> > and
> >
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao. Just to be sure (I asked in the previous
> thread), would it be better to avoid the length check in skb_update_prio, and
> instead update the netdev tables to be long enough in cgrp_create and in
>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:45:10AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> dev->priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
> update_netdev_tables().
> And this is only called if write_priomap() is called.
>
> But if write_priomap() is not called, it seems we can have
于 2012年07月09日 15:45, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> dev->priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
> update_netdev_tables().
> And this is only called if write_priomap() is called.
>
> But if write_priomap() is not called, it seems we can have out of bounds
> accesses
From: Eric Dumazet
dev->priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
update_netdev_tables().
And this is only called if write_priomap() is called.
But if write_priomap() is not called, it seems we can have out of bounds
accesses in cgrp_destroy(), read_priomap() & skb_update_prio()
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
dev-priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
update_netdev_tables().
And this is only called if write_priomap() is called.
But if write_priomap() is not called, it seems we can have out of bounds
accesses in cgrp_destroy(), read_priomap()
于 2012年07月09日 15:45, Eric Dumazet 写道:
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
dev-priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
update_netdev_tables().
And this is only called if write_priomap() is called.
But if write_priomap() is not called, it seems we can have out of bounds
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:45:10AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
dev-priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
update_netdev_tables().
And this is only called if write_priomap() is called.
But if write_priomap() is not called, it seems
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao. Just to be sure (I asked in the previous
thread), would it be better to avoid the length check in skb_update_prio, and
instead update the netdev tables to be long enough in cgrp_create and in
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:50:52PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao. Just to be sure (I asked in the
previous
thread), would it be better to avoid the length check in skb_update_prio,
and
instead
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 08:13 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:50:52PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao. Just to be sure (I asked in the
previous
thread), would it be better to
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:40:25PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 08:13 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:50:52PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao. Just to be sure
From: Gao feng gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:15:29 +0800
于 2012年07月09日 15:45, Eric Dumazet 写道:
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
dev-priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
update_netdev_tables().
And this is only called if write_priomap() is
于 2012年07月10日 05:51, David Miller 写道:
From: Gao feng gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:15:29 +0800
于 2012年07月09日 15:45, Eric Dumazet 写道:
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
dev-priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
update_netdev_tables().
And this is
From: Gao feng gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:33:23 +0800
Please see my patch in this thread, I think it's a better way to fix this bug.
You'll need to work that out with Eric, fwiw I think his patch was
clean and just fine and it's staying in my tree.
--
To unsubscribe from
20 matches
Mail list logo
