On 2018/4/9 22:42, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On 04/09/2018 07:10 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
dccp_init() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as a parameter of module_init().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
dccp_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
On 2018/4/9 22:42, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On 04/09/2018 07:10 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
dccp_init() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as a parameter of module_init().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
dccp_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
On 04/09/2018 07:10 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> dccp_init() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as a parameter of module_init().
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> dccp_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which waits busily for
On 04/09/2018 07:10 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> dccp_init() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as a parameter of module_init().
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> dccp_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which waits busily for
dccp_init() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as a parameter of module_init().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
dccp_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with
dccp_init() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as a parameter of module_init().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
dccp_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with
6 matches
Mail list logo
