Le 10/05/2017 à 06:46, Julia Lawall a écrit :
On Wed, 10 May 2017, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 09/05/2017 à 17:18, Joe Perches a écrit :
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 17:35 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
Each
Le 10/05/2017 à 06:46, Julia Lawall a écrit :
On Wed, 10 May 2017, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 09/05/2017 à 17:18, Joe Perches a écrit :
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 17:35 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
Each
On Wed, 10 May 2017, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 09/05/2017 à 17:18, Joe Perches a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 17:35 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > Each time -EPROBE_DEFER occurs,
On Wed, 10 May 2017, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 09/05/2017 à 17:18, Joe Perches a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 17:35 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > Each time -EPROBE_DEFER occurs,
Le 09/05/2017 à 17:18, Joe Perches a écrit :
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 17:35 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
Each time -EPROBE_DEFER occurs, another set of calls to
dsa_switch_alloc and dev_kzalloc also occurs.
Le 09/05/2017 à 17:18, Joe Perches a écrit :
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 17:35 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
Each time -EPROBE_DEFER occurs, another set of calls to
dsa_switch_alloc and dev_kzalloc also occurs.
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 17:35 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Each time -EPROBE_DEFER occurs, another set of calls to
> > > dsa_switch_alloc and dev_kzalloc also occurs.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it'd be better
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 17:35 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Each time -EPROBE_DEFER occurs, another set of calls to
> > > dsa_switch_alloc and dev_kzalloc also occurs.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it'd be better
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:32 +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
> >>>
> From: Christophe JAILLET
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:32 +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
> >>>
> From: Christophe JAILLET
On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:32 +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
>>>
From: Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a
On 05/08/2017 04:46 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:32 +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
>>>
From: Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:32 +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
> >
> > > From: Christophe JAILLET
> > > > Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> > > > If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> > > > Return
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:32 +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
> >
> > > From: Christophe JAILLET
> > > > Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> > > > If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> > > > Return
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:32 +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
>
> > From: Christophe JAILLET
> > > Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> > > If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> > > Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:32 +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
>
> > From: Christophe JAILLET
> > > Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> > > If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> > > Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory
From: Christophe JAILLET
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 07:29:45 +0200
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> few lines above.
>
> Fixes: 98cd1552ea27 ("net: dsa: Mock-up
From: Christophe JAILLET
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 07:29:45 +0200
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> few lines above.
>
> Fixes: 98cd1552ea27 ("net: dsa: Mock-up driver")
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
> From: Christophe JAILLET
> > Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> > If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> > Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> > few lines above.
> ...
> > ---
On Mon, 8 May 2017, David Laight wrote:
> From: Christophe JAILLET
> > Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> > If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> > Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> > few lines above.
> ...
> > ---
From: Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> few lines above.
...
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/dsa_loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/dsa_loop.c
> @@ -256,6
From: Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: 06 May 2017 06:30
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> few lines above.
...
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/dsa_loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/dsa_loop.c
> @@ -256,6
Le 05/05/17 à 22:29, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> few lines above.
>
> Fixes: 98cd1552ea27 ("net: dsa: Mock-up driver")
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe
Le 05/05/17 à 22:29, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> few lines above.
>
> Fixes: 98cd1552ea27 ("net: dsa: Mock-up driver")
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 07:29:45AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> few lines above.
>
> Fixes: 98cd1552ea27 ("net: dsa: Mock-up driver")
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 07:29:45AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
> few lines above.
>
> Fixes: 98cd1552ea27 ("net: dsa: Mock-up driver")
>
> Signed-off-by:
If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
few lines above.
Fixes: 98cd1552ea27 ("net: dsa: Mock-up driver")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
---
If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for some other memory allocation just a
few lines above.
Fixes: 98cd1552ea27 ("net: dsa: Mock-up driver")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
---
drivers/net/dsa/dsa_loop.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3
28 matches
Mail list logo