On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:25:57 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On 10/19/19 2:18 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > Whatever works is fine by me. gfpflags_allow_blocking() is clearer
> > than testing __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM directly tho. Maybe a better way is
> > introducing a new gfpflags_ helper?
>
> Sounds
On 10/19/19 2:18 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Whatever works is fine by me. gfpflags_allow_blocking() is clearer
> than testing __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM directly tho. Maybe a better way is
> introducing a new gfpflags_ helper?
Sounds good to me !
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:15:28AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> It seems compiler generates better code with :
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index
> ab905c4b1f0efd42ebdcae333b3f0a2c7c1b2248..56de6ac99f0952bd0bc003353c094ce3a5a852f4
> 100644
> --- a/include/ne
On 10/19/19 10:01 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> From f0335a5d14d3596d36e3ffddb2fd4fa0dc6ca9c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tejun Heo
> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 09:10:57 -0700
>
> sk_page_frag() optimizes skb_frag allocations by using per-task
> skb_frag cache when it knows it's the only user. The
>From f0335a5d14d3596d36e3ffddb2fd4fa0dc6ca9c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 09:10:57 -0700
sk_page_frag() optimizes skb_frag allocations by using per-task
skb_frag cache when it knows it's the only user. The condition is
determined by seeing whether the socket
5 matches
Mail list logo