From: Robert Jarzmik
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:56:58 +0100
> Robert Jarzmik writes:
>
>> Fabio Estevam writes:
>>> Tested-by: Fabio Estevam
>>
>> Thanks Fabio for the test.
>>
>> I also tried with a different different approach.
>>
>> I built the different platforms (imx v6, etc ...) :
>> -
Robert Jarzmik writes:
> Fabio Estevam writes:
>> Tested-by: Fabio Estevam
>
> Thanks Fabio for the test.
>
> I also tried with a different different approach.
>
> I built the different platforms (imx v6, etc ...) :
> - one version (a) on a vanilla v4.5-rc2
> - one version (b) on a vaniall v4
Fabio Estevam writes:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Robert Jarzmik
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'll reping once more, to see if any of you could give this patch a try.
>> So far Hitoshi doesn't have the hardware anymore, so it leaves only Guennadi
>> and
>> Fabio.
>>
>> If you could give
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll reping once more, to see if any of you could give this patch a try.
> So far Hitoshi doesn't have the hardware anymore, so it leaves only Guennadi
> and
> Fabio.
>
> If you could give it a try it would be great.
>
> For re
urrently I don't have the board :(
> Do you have a working board that can be used for testing, Guennadi?
Don't think I have anything, that I could use for testing with a
reasonable effort.
Thanks
Guennadi
>
> Thanks,
> Hitoshi
>
> > - armadillo5x0: Alberto
> > -
Hitoshi Mitake writes:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> > Please just keep pinging people to properly test this.
>
> Okay, let's have another try.
>
> Hi Guennadi, Hitoshi, Fabio,
>
> Could any of you try this patch to ensure
so sending it again)
Really sorry, currently I don't have the board :(
Do you have a working board that can be used for testing, Guennadi?
Thanks,
Hitoshi
> - armadillo5x0: Alberto
> - imx v6 and imx v7: Fabio
>
> Cheers.
>
> --
> Robert
>
>
> ---8<---
sing smc911x AFAIK:
- sh2007: Guennadi and Hitoshi
- armadillo5x0: Alberto
- imx v6 and imx v7: Fabio
Cheers.
--
Robert
---8<---
From: Robert Jarzmik
Subject: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine
To: "David S. Miller"
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kerne
From: Robert Jarzmik
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:44:56 +0100
> Apart from Alberto who answered he cannot test it by lack of hardware, the
> others didn't answer.
>
> So how can I move forward ? Would you want me to amend the KConfig to add a
> "&&
> !ARCH_PXA" on the "depend" line ?
Please just
Robert Jarzmik writes:
> David Miller writes:
>
>> From: Robert Jarzmik
>> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:40:28 +0100
>>
>>> Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine
>>> slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic.
>>>
>>> The driver was only compile
and what you wish to do : either drop the patch
or apply, or something else.
Cheers.
--
Robert
--8>--
>From 9b7e996fe92d81d417f59a4eed92b3472594a2e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Jarzmik
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:48:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine
From: Robert Jarzmik
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:40:28 +0100
> Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine
> slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic.
>
> The driver was only compile tested. The risk is quite small as no
> current PXA platform I'm a
Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine
slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic.
The driver was only compile tested. The risk is quite small as no
current PXA platform I'm aware of is using smc911x driver.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik
---
d
13 matches
Mail list logo
