Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:56:58 +0100 > Robert Jarzmik writes: > >> Fabio Estevam writes: >>> Tested-by: Fabio Estevam >> >> Thanks Fabio for the test. >> >> I also tried with a

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:56:58 +0100 > Robert Jarzmik writes: > >> Fabio Estevam writes: >>> Tested-by: Fabio Estevam >> >> Thanks Fabio for the test. >> >> I also tried with a different different approach. >> >> I built the different platforms (imx v6, etc ...) : >> -

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Robert Jarzmik writes: > Fabio Estevam writes: >> Tested-by: Fabio Estevam > > Thanks Fabio for the test. > > I also tried with a different different approach. > > I built the different platforms (imx v6, etc ...) : > - one

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Robert Jarzmik writes: > Fabio Estevam writes: >> Tested-by: Fabio Estevam > > Thanks Fabio for the test. > > I also tried with a different different approach. > > I built the different platforms (imx v6, etc ...) : > - one version (a) on a vanilla v4.5-rc2 > - one version (b) on a vaniall

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Fabio Estevam writes: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Robert Jarzmik > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'll reping once more, to see if any of you could give this patch a try. >> So far Hitoshi doesn't have the hardware anymore, so it leaves only

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Fabio Estevam writes: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Robert Jarzmik > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'll reping once more, to see if any of you could give this patch a try. >> So far Hitoshi doesn't have the hardware anymore, so it leaves only Guennadi >> and >> Fabio. >> >> If you could give

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hello, > > I'll reping once more, to see if any of you could give this patch a try. > So far Hitoshi doesn't have the hardware anymore, so it leaves only Guennadi > and > Fabio. > > If you could give it a try it

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hello, > > I'll reping once more, to see if any of you could give this patch a try. > So far Hitoshi doesn't have the hardware anymore, so it leaves only Guennadi > and > Fabio. > > If you could give it a try it would be great. > > For

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

t; > Really sorry, currently I don't have the board :( > Do you have a working board that can be used for testing, Guennadi? Don't think I have anything, that I could use for testing with a reasonable effort. Thanks Guennadi > > Thanks, > Hitoshi > > > - armad

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

board :( > Do you have a working board that can be used for testing, Guennadi? Don't think I have anything, that I could use for testing with a reasonable effort. Thanks Guennadi > > Thanks, > Hitoshi > > > - armadillo5x0: Alberto > > - imx v6 and imx v7: Fabio > >

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Hitoshi Mitake writes: > Hi Robert, > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > Please just keep pinging people to properly test this. > > Okay, let's have another try. > > Hi Guennadi, Hitoshi, Fabio, >

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Hitoshi Mitake writes: > Hi Robert, > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > Please just keep pinging people to properly test this. > > Okay, let's have another try. > > Hi Guennadi, Hitoshi, Fabio, > > Could any of you try this patch to

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

ced my previous mail was bounced, so sending it again) Really sorry, currently I don't have the board :( Do you have a working board that can be used for testing, Guennadi? Thanks, Hitoshi > - armadillo5x0: Alberto > - imx v6 and imx v7: Fabio > > Cheers. > > -- &

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

ally sorry, currently I don't have the board :( Do you have a working board that can be used for testing, Guennadi? Thanks, Hitoshi > - armadillo5x0: Alberto > - imx v6 and imx v7: Fabio > > Cheers. > > -- > Robert > > > ---8<--- > From: Robert Jarzmik >

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

2007: Guennadi and Hitoshi - armadillo5x0: Alberto - imx v6 and imx v7: Fabio Cheers. -- Robert ---8<--- From: Robert Jarzmik Subject: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine To: "David S. Miller" Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Jarzmik D

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

he maintainers of the following boards using smc911x AFAIK: - sh2007: Guennadi and Hitoshi - armadillo5x0: Alberto - imx v6 and imx v7: Fabio Cheers. -- Robert ---8<--- From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> Subject: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine To: "David

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:44:56 +0100 > Apart from Alberto who answered he cannot test it by lack of hardware, the > others didn't answer. > > So how can I move forward ? Would you want me to amend the KConfig to add a > "&& > !ARCH_PXA" on the "depend" line ? Please just

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Robert Jarzmik writes: > David Miller writes: > >> From: Robert Jarzmik >> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:40:28 +0100 >> >>> Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine >>> slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic. >>> >>> The driver was only

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Robert Jarzmik writes: > David Miller writes: > >> From: Robert Jarzmik >> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:40:28 +0100 >> >>> Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine >>> slave driver. This makes

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:44:56 +0100 > Apart from Alberto who answered he cannot test it by lack of hardware, the > others didn't answer. > > So how can I move forward ? Would you want me to amend the KConfig to add a > "&& > !ARCH_PXA" on the

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

her drop the patch or apply, or something else. Cheers. -- Robert --8>-- >From 9b7e996fe92d81d417f59a4eed92b3472594a2e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:48:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine Convert the dma transfers to b

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

identified so far). So could we agree on a deadline, and what you wish to do : either drop the patch or apply, or something else. Cheers. -- Robert --8>-- >From 9b7e996fe92d81d417f59a4eed92b3472594a2e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> Date: Thu,

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:40:28 +0100 > Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine > slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic. > > The driver was only compile tested. The risk is quite small as no > current PXA platform I'm

Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:40:28 +0100 > Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine > slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic. > > The driver was only compile tested. The risk is quite small as no >

[PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic. The driver was only compile tested. The risk is quite small as no current PXA platform I'm aware of is using smc911x driver. Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik ---

[PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic. The driver was only compile tested. The risk is quite small as no current PXA platform I'm aware of is using smc911x driver. Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik