From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:04:39 +0300
> Or is it just a formal requirement to RESEND?
Yes, this always what I ask people to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:04:39 +0300
> Or is it just a formal requirement to RESEND?
Yes, this always what I ask people to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
Hello!
> >> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
> >
> > I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
> > clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
> > break.
>
> If I didn't reply it means I don't have anything
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:05:24 +0300
> Hello!
>
>> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
>
> I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
> clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
> break.
If I
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:05:24 +0300
> Hello!
>
>> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
>
> I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
> clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test
Hello!
> >> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
> >
> > I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
> > clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
> > break.
>
> If I didn't reply it means I don't have anything
Hello!
> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
break. Because the (simplified) algorithm is:
do {
result = loopback_test()
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:36:24 +0300
> Hello! So, what should we do with this?
If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
The ball is always in your court.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:36:24 +0300
> Hello! So, what should we do with this?
If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
The ball is always in your court.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hello!
> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
break. Because the (simplified) algorithm is:
do {
result = loopback_test()
ber 02, 2015 10:19 AM
> To: 'David Miller'
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> steve.glendinn...@shawell.net
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: Reset PHY during initialization
>
> Hello!
>
> > > On certain hardware after so
ber 02, 2015 10:19 AM
> To: 'David Miller'
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> steve.glendinn...@shawell.net
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: Reset PHY during initialization
>
> Hello!
>
> > > On certain hardware after so
Hello!
> > On certain hardware after software reboot the chip may get stuck and fail
> > to reinitialize during reset. This can be fixed by ensuring that PHY is
> > reset too.
> >
> > Old PHY resetting method required operational MDIO interface, therefore
> > the chip should have been already
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:06:19 +0300
> On certain hardware after software reboot the chip may get stuck and fail
> to reinitialize during reset. This can be fixed by ensuring that PHY is
> reset too.
>
> Old PHY resetting method required operational MDIO interface, therefore
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:06:19 +0300
> On certain hardware after software reboot the chip may get stuck and fail
> to reinitialize during reset. This can be fixed by ensuring that PHY is
> reset too.
>
> Old PHY resetting method required operational MDIO
Hello!
> > On certain hardware after software reboot the chip may get stuck and fail
> > to reinitialize during reset. This can be fixed by ensuring that PHY is
> > reset too.
> >
> > Old PHY resetting method required operational MDIO interface, therefore
> > the chip should have been already
On certain hardware after software reboot the chip may get stuck and fail
to reinitialize during reset. This can be fixed by ensuring that PHY is
reset too.
Old PHY resetting method required operational MDIO interface, therefore
the chip should have been already set up. In order to be able to
On certain hardware after software reboot the chip may get stuck and fail
to reinitialize during reset. This can be fixed by ensuring that PHY is
reset too.
Old PHY resetting method required operational MDIO interface, therefore
the chip should have been already set up. In order to be able to
18 matches
Mail list logo