Hi!
On 03/23/2015 04:52 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 13:38 +0300, Alexey Kodanev wrote:
Regression introduced by commit 2dc49d1680.
tcp_v6_fill_cb() will be called twice if socket's state changes from
TCP_TIME_WAIT to TCP_LISTEN. That can result in performance loss and
control
Hi Eric,
On 03/23/2015 05:38 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 13:38 +0300, Alexey Kodanev wrote:
\
@@ -1538,7 +1525,7 @@ do_time_wait:
&ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr, th->source,
&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr,
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 13:38 +0300, Alexey Kodanev wrote:
\
> @@ -1538,7 +1525,7 @@ do_time_wait:
> &ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr, th->source,
> &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr,
> ntohs(th->de
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 13:38 +0300, Alexey Kodanev wrote:
> Regression introduced by commit 2dc49d1680.
>
> tcp_v6_fill_cb() will be called twice if socket's state changes from
> TCP_TIME_WAIT to TCP_LISTEN. That can result in performance loss and
> control buffer data corruption because in the sec
Regression introduced by commit 2dc49d1680.
tcp_v6_fill_cb() will be called twice if socket's state changes from
TCP_TIME_WAIT to TCP_LISTEN. That can result in performance loss and
control buffer data corruption because in the second tcp_v6_fill_cb()
it's not copying the 'header' anymore, but 'se
5 matches
Mail list logo