From: Jianyu Zhan
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:25:41 +0800
> I don't think that the value of one field(early_init) has a so subtle
> restrition on the another field(css_alloc) is a good thing, but since
> it is there, docment it should be needed.
This is not a reasonable change.
We depend upon imp
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> NACK, for the same reason that it doesn't make sense for net_classid.
> Early_init should already be zero. What problem are you trying to solve here?
Hi, Neil,
I'm sorry I should have made this more clear.
Sure, for this global variable str
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:32:02PM +0800, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> For a cgroup subsystem who should init early, then it should carefully
> take care of the implementation of css_alloc, because it will be called
> before mm_init() setup the world.
>
> Luckily we don't, and we better explicitly assign
For a cgroup subsystem who should init early, then it should carefully
take care of the implementation of css_alloc, because it will be called
before mm_init() setup the world.
Luckily we don't, and we better explicitly assign the early_init field
to 0, for document reason.
Signed-off-by: Jianyu
4 matches
Mail list logo