Re: [PATCH] nsproxy: Check to make sure count is truly zero before freeing

2013-11-18 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:22:54 +0800 Gao feng wrote: > On 11/19/2013 08:04 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > I'll start out saying that this email was a complete oops. I only kept > > it around for reference, as this didn't fix the bug we were seeing, and > > I used this email to just document

Re: [PATCH] nsproxy: Check to make sure count is truly zero before freeing

2013-11-18 Thread Gao feng
On 11/19/2013 08:04 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I'll start out saying that this email was a complete oops. I only kept > it around for reference, as this didn't fix the bug we were seeing, and > I used this email to just document what I initially thought. > Can you describe the panic

Re: [PATCH] nsproxy: Check to make sure count is truly zero before freeing

2013-11-18 Thread Gao feng
On 11/19/2013 08:04 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: I'll start out saying that this email was a complete oops. I only kept it around for reference, as this didn't fix the bug we were seeing, and I used this email to just document what I initially thought. Can you describe the panic situation and

Re: [PATCH] nsproxy: Check to make sure count is truly zero before freeing

2013-11-18 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:22:54 +0800 Gao feng gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote: On 11/19/2013 08:04 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: I'll start out saying that this email was a complete oops. I only kept it around for reference, as this didn't fix the bug we were seeing, and I used this email to