On 12/8/18 11:31 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2018, at 11:22 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/8/18 9:38 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/8/18 5:49 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:18:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We need a better way of config
On 12/8/18 10:31 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Dec 8, 2018, at 11:22 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 12/8/18 9:38 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/8/18 5:49 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:18:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
We need a better way of configuring this, and given that p
On Dec 8, 2018, at 11:22 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> On 12/8/18 9:38 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 12/8/18 5:49 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:18:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
We need a better way of configuring this, and given that polling is
(st
On 12/8/18 9:38 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/8/18 5:49 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:18:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
We need a better way of configuring this, and given that polling is
(still) a bit niche, let's default to using 0 poll queues. That way
we'll have the
On 12/8/18 5:49 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:18:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> We need a better way of configuring this, and given that polling is
>> (still) a bit niche, let's default to using 0 poll queues. That way
>> we'll have the same read/write/poll behavi
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:18:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We need a better way of configuring this, and given that polling is
> (still) a bit niche, let's default to using 0 poll queues. That way
> we'll have the same read/write/poll behavior as 4.20, and users that
> want to test/use poll
6 matches
Mail list logo