On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 09:30:18AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:59:45AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:02:12PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:45:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > arguably it simply isn'
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:59:45AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:02:12PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:45:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > arguably it simply isn't a good idea to use static_call() in __exit
> > > code anyway, since mo
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:02:12PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:45:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > arguably it simply isn't a good idea to use static_call() in __exit
> > code anyway, since module unload is never a performance critical path.
>
> Couldn't you make
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 03:26, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:07:07PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 18:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:25:48PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > Thanks Peter for this fix. It does work for
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:45:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> arguably it simply isn't a good idea to use static_call() in __exit
> code anyway, since module unload is never a performance critical path.
Couldn't you make the same argument about __init functions, which are
allowed to do static
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:07:07PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 18:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:25:48PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > Thanks Peter for this fix. It does work for me on qemu for x86. Can
> > > you turn this into a proper fix patc
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:45:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:25:48PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Thanks Peter for this fix. It does work for me on qemu for x86. Can
> > you turn this into a proper fix patch? BTW, feel free to add:
>
> Per the below, the original pa
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 18:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:25:48PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Thanks Peter for this fix. It does work for me on qemu for x86. Can
> > you turn this into a proper fix patch? BTW, feel free to add:
>
> Per the below, the original patch ought
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:25:48PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Thanks Peter for this fix. It does work for me on qemu for x86. Can
> you turn this into a proper fix patch? BTW, feel free to add:
Per the below, the original patch ought to be fixed as well, to not use
static_call() in __exit.
---
Su
9 matches
Mail list logo