Re: [PATCH] objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage

2019-07-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:30 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:48 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:10:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > And that most certainly should trigger... > > > > > > Let me gdb that objtool thing. > > > > --- > > Subject:

Re: [PATCH] objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage

2019-07-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:48 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:10:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > And that most certainly should trigger... > > > > Let me gdb that objtool thing. > > --- > Subject: objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage > > A clang build reported an (obvious

Re: [PATCH] objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage

2019-07-24 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:48 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:10:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > And that most certainly should trigger... > > > > Let me gdb that objtool thing. > > --- > Subject: objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage > > A clang build reported an (obvious

Re: [PATCH] objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage

2019-07-24 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:48:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:10:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > And that most certainly should trigger... > > > > Let me gdb that objtool thing. > > --- > Subject: objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage > > A clang build reported a

[PATCH] objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage

2019-07-24 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:10:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > And that most certainly should trigger... > > Let me gdb that objtool thing. --- Subject: objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage A clang build reported an (obvious) double CLAC while a GCC build did not; it turns out we only re-visit i