On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 14:46 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>> lpc_size could be added. It's currently useless to the library, but
>> > doesn't
>> > hurt. The one which was giving me troubles on a previous version of
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 14:46 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>> lpc_size could be added. It's currently useless to the library, but
>> > doesn't
>> > hurt. The one which was giving me troubles on a previous version of
>> > this
>> > patch
On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 14:46 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> lpc_size could be added. It's currently useless to the library, but
> > doesn't
> > hurt. The one which was giving me troubles on a previous version of
> > this
> > patch was the lpc numa node ID, since that was experimental code
> > and
On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 14:46 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> lpc_size could be added. It's currently useless to the library, but
> > doesn't
> > hurt. The one which was giving me troubles on a previous version of
> > this
> > patch was the lpc numa node ID, since that was experimental code
> > and
On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 14:41 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Alastair D'Silva com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 17:43 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva > > bm.c
> > > om>
On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 14:41 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Alastair D'Silva com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 17:43 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva > > bm.c
> > > om> wrote:
> > > > From: Alastair D'Silva
On 22/02/18 14:41, Balbir Singh wrote:
Setting it to 0 is for the reader, not the compiler. I'm not clear on
the benefit of starting the version at 1, could you clarify?
How do I distinguish between version number never set and 0?
The ioctl won't exist without a version number set.
--
On 22/02/18 14:41, Balbir Singh wrote:
Setting it to 0 is for the reader, not the compiler. I'm not clear on
the benefit of starting the version at 1, could you clarify?
How do I distinguish between version number never set and 0?
The ioctl won't exist without a version number set.
--
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Frederic Barrat
wrote:
>
>
> Le 21/02/2018 à 07:43, Balbir Singh a écrit :
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Alastair D'Silva
>>>
>>> Some
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Frederic Barrat
wrote:
>
>
> Le 21/02/2018 à 07:43, Balbir Singh a écrit :
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Alastair D'Silva
>>>
>>> Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently (eg. the
>>>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 17:43 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva > om> wrote:
>> > From: Alastair D'Silva
>> >
>> > Some
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 17:43 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva > om> wrote:
>> > From: Alastair D'Silva
>> >
>> > Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently
>> > (eg.
"Alastair D'Silva" writes:
> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 17:43 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva > om> wrote:
>> > From: Alastair D'Silva
>> >
...
>> > diff --git a/include/uapi/misc/ocxl.h
"Alastair D'Silva" writes:
> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 17:43 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva > om> wrote:
>> > From: Alastair D'Silva
>> >
...
>> > diff --git a/include/uapi/misc/ocxl.h b/include/uapi/misc/ocxl.h
>> > index 4b0b0b756f3e..16e1f48ce280
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 12:25 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>
> Le 21/02/2018 à 07:43, Balbir Singh a écrit :
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva > .com> wrote:
> > > From: Alastair D'Silva
> > >
> > > Some required information is not
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 12:25 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>
> Le 21/02/2018 à 07:43, Balbir Singh a écrit :
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva > .com> wrote:
> > > From: Alastair D'Silva
> > >
> > > Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently
> > > (eg.
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 17:43 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva om> wrote:
> > From: Alastair D'Silva
> >
> > Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently
> > (eg. the
> > PASID), pass this
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 17:43 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva om> wrote:
> > From: Alastair D'Silva
> >
> > Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently
> > (eg. the
> > PASID), pass this information back, along with other
Le 21/02/2018 à 07:43, Balbir Singh a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
From: Alastair D'Silva
Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently (eg. the
PASID), pass this information back, along with
Le 21/02/2018 à 07:43, Balbir Singh a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
From: Alastair D'Silva
Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently (eg. the
PASID), pass this information back, along with other information which
is currently
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva
>
> Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently (eg. the
> PASID), pass this information back, along with other information which
> is currently
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva
>
> Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently (eg. the
> PASID), pass this information back, along with other information which
> is currently communicated via sysfs, which saves some parsing
On 21/02/18 15:57, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
From: Alastair D'Silva
Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently (eg. the
PASID), pass this information back, along with other information which
is currently communicated via sysfs, which saves some parsing
On 21/02/18 15:57, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
From: Alastair D'Silva
Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently (eg. the
PASID), pass this information back, along with other information which
is currently communicated via sysfs, which saves some parsing effort in
userspace.
From: Alastair D'Silva
Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently (eg. the
PASID), pass this information back, along with other information which
is currently communicated via sysfs, which saves some parsing effort in
userspace.
Signed-off-by: Alastair
From: Alastair D'Silva
Some required information is not exposed to userspace currently (eg. the
PASID), pass this information back, along with other information which
is currently communicated via sysfs, which saves some parsing effort in
userspace.
Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva
---
26 matches
Mail list logo