The new testcase that checks phandle consistency was using a hash table
on the stack which made the frame size much large than it should be. Fix
the problem by moving the hash table into the file scope.

Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org>
---

This patch applies on my devicetree/next branch, which I'm going to ask
Linux to pull later this week.

g.

 drivers/of/selftest.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/selftest.c b/drivers/of/selftest.c
index 4fed34bff5cf..78001270a598 100644
--- a/drivers/of/selftest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/selftest.c
@@ -198,20 +198,19 @@ struct node_hash {
        struct device_node *np;
 };
 
+static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(phandle_ht, 8);
 static void __init of_selftest_check_phandles(void)
 {
        struct device_node *np;
        struct node_hash *nh;
        struct hlist_node *tmp;
        int i, dup_count = 0, phandle_count = 0;
-       DECLARE_HASHTABLE(ht, 8);
 
-       hash_init(ht);
        for_each_of_allnodes(np) {
                if (!np->phandle)
                        continue;
 
-               hash_for_each_possible(ht, nh, node, np->phandle) {
+               hash_for_each_possible(phandle_ht, nh, node, np->phandle) {
                        if (nh->np->phandle == np->phandle) {
                                pr_info("Duplicate phandle! %i used by %s and 
%s\n",
                                        np->phandle, nh->np->full_name, 
np->full_name);
@@ -225,14 +224,14 @@ static void __init of_selftest_check_phandles(void)
                        return;
 
                nh->np = np;
-               hash_add(ht, &nh->node, np->phandle);
+               hash_add(phandle_ht, &nh->node, np->phandle);
                phandle_count++;
        }
        selftest(dup_count == 0, "Found %i duplicates in %i phandles\n",
                 dup_count, phandle_count);
 
        /* Clean up */
-       hash_for_each_safe(ht, i, tmp, nh, node) {
+       hash_for_each_safe(phandle_ht, i, tmp, nh, node) {
                hash_del(&nh->node);
                kfree(nh);
        }
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to