Re: [PATCH] of: property: fw_devlink: Ignore interrupts property for some configs

2021-02-17 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 4:43 PM Saravana Kannan wrote: > > When CONFIG_OF_IRQ is not defined, it doesn't make sense to parse > interrupts property. > > Also, parsing and tracking interrupts property breaks some PPC > devices[1]. But none of the IRQ drivers in PPC seem ready to be > converted to

Re: [PATCH] of: property: fw_devlink: Ignore interrupts property for some configs

2021-02-16 Thread Saravana Kannan
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:20 PM Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > > On 15.02.21 23:42, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > Hi, > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c > > index 79b68519fe30..5036a362f52e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/of/property.c > > +++

Re: [PATCH] of: property: fw_devlink: Ignore interrupts property for some configs

2021-02-16 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 15.02.21 23:42, Saravana Kannan wrote: Hi, diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c index 79b68519fe30..5036a362f52e 100644 --- a/drivers/of/property.c +++ b/drivers/of/property.c @@ -1300,6 +1300,9 @@ static struct device_node *parse_interrupts(struct device_node *np,

Re: [PATCH] of: property: fw_devlink: Ignore interrupts property for some configs

2021-02-15 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 02:42:58PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote: > When CONFIG_OF_IRQ is not defined, it doesn't make sense to parse > interrupts property. > > Also, parsing and tracking interrupts property breaks some PPC > devices[1]. But none of the IRQ drivers in PPC seem ready to be >

[PATCH] of: property: fw_devlink: Ignore interrupts property for some configs

2021-02-15 Thread Saravana Kannan
When CONFIG_OF_IRQ is not defined, it doesn't make sense to parse interrupts property. Also, parsing and tracking interrupts property breaks some PPC devices[1]. But none of the IRQ drivers in PPC seem ready to be converted to a proper platform (or any bus) driver. So, there's not much of a