Re: [PATCH] os_dep: Replace rcu_dereference() with rcu_access_pointer()

2014-08-30 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 04:39:16PM +0300, Andreea-Cristina Bernat wrote: > The "rcu_dereference()" call is used directly in a condition. > Since its return value is never dereferenced it is recommended to use > "rcu_access_pointer()" instead of "rcu_dereference()". > Therefore, this patch makes

Re: [PATCH] os_dep: Replace rcu_dereference() with rcu_access_pointer()

2014-08-30 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 04:39:16PM +0300, Andreea-Cristina Bernat wrote: The rcu_dereference() call is used directly in a condition. Since its return value is never dereferenced it is recommended to use rcu_access_pointer() instead of rcu_dereference(). Therefore, this patch makes the

[PATCH] os_dep: Replace rcu_dereference() with rcu_access_pointer()

2014-08-17 Thread Andreea-Cristina Bernat
The "rcu_dereference()" call is used directly in a condition. Since its return value is never dereferenced it is recommended to use "rcu_access_pointer()" instead of "rcu_dereference()". Therefore, this patch makes the replacement. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used: @@ @@ ( if(

[PATCH] os_dep: Replace rcu_dereference() with rcu_access_pointer()

2014-08-17 Thread Andreea-Cristina Bernat
The rcu_dereference() call is used directly in a condition. Since its return value is never dereferenced it is recommended to use rcu_access_pointer() instead of rcu_dereference(). Therefore, this patch makes the replacement. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used: @@ @@ ( if( (+...