Re: [PATCH] ovl: fix return value of ovl_fill_super

2016-12-06 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Geliang Tang wrote: > If kcalloc() failed, the return value of ovl_fill_super() is -EINVAL, > not -ENOMEM. So this patch sets this value to -ENOMEM before calling > kcalloc(), and sets it back to -EINVAL after calling kcalloc(). Thanks,

Re: [PATCH] ovl: fix return value of ovl_fill_super

2016-12-06 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Geliang Tang wrote: > If kcalloc() failed, the return value of ovl_fill_super() is -EINVAL, > not -ENOMEM. So this patch sets this value to -ENOMEM before calling > kcalloc(), and sets it back to -EINVAL after calling kcalloc(). Thanks, applied. Miklos

[PATCH] ovl: fix return value of ovl_fill_super

2016-11-18 Thread Geliang Tang
If kcalloc() failed, the return value of ovl_fill_super() is -EINVAL, not -ENOMEM. So this patch sets this value to -ENOMEM before calling kcalloc(), and sets it back to -EINVAL after calling kcalloc(). Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang --- fs/overlayfs/super.c | 2 ++ 1 file

[PATCH] ovl: fix return value of ovl_fill_super

2016-11-18 Thread Geliang Tang
If kcalloc() failed, the return value of ovl_fill_super() is -EINVAL, not -ENOMEM. So this patch sets this value to -ENOMEM before calling kcalloc(), and sets it back to -EINVAL after calling kcalloc(). Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang --- fs/overlayfs/super.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)