On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 09:01:27PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> This bridge has the same problems as the ITE 8892, which were resulting in
> crippling an older PCI 1Gbps NIC down to 45Mbps throughput with IOMMU and
> VT-d enabled. With the patch, this old e1000 goes back up to ~900Mbps.
>
>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 09:01:27PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> This bridge has the same problems as the ITE 8892, which were resulting in
> crippling an older PCI 1Gbps NIC down to 45Mbps throughput with IOMMU and
> VT-d enabled. With the patch, this old e1000 goes back up to ~900Mbps.
>
>
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 21:01:27 -0400
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> This bridge has the same problems as the ITE 8892, which were resulting in
> crippling an older PCI 1Gbps NIC down to 45Mbps throughput with IOMMU and
> VT-d enabled. With the patch, this old e1000 goes back up to
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 21:01:27 -0400
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> This bridge has the same problems as the ITE 8892, which were resulting in
> crippling an older PCI 1Gbps NIC down to 45Mbps throughput with IOMMU and
> VT-d enabled. With the patch, this old e1000 goes back up to ~900Mbps.
>
>
This bridge has the same problems as the ITE 8892, which were resulting in
crippling an older PCI 1Gbps NIC down to 45Mbps throughput with IOMMU and
VT-d enabled. With the patch, this old e1000 goes back up to ~900Mbps.
Suggested-by: Alex Williamson
CC:
This bridge has the same problems as the ITE 8892, which were resulting in
crippling an older PCI 1Gbps NIC down to 45Mbps throughput with IOMMU and
VT-d enabled. With the patch, this old e1000 goes back up to ~900Mbps.
Suggested-by: Alex Williamson
CC: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
CC: Alex
6 matches
Mail list logo