On 08/08/2012 11:24 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 23:00 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 23:00 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
> > On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On 8/8/12 12:00 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Don Dutile ddut...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM,
On 8/8/12 12:00 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Don Dutile ddut...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 23:00 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Don Dutile ddut...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30
On 08/08/2012 11:24 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 23:00 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Don Dutileddut...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com
On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
(bus->self ==
On 08/06/2012 04:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
It's possible to have
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson
>> wrote:
>> > It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
>> > (bus->self == NULL). SR-IOV can generate such buses.
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
(bus-self ==
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson
> wrote:
> > It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
> > (bus->self == NULL). SR-IOV can generate such buses. When
> > we find these, skip to the parent bus to look for
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
> It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
> (bus->self == NULL). SR-IOV can generate such buses. When
> we find these, skip to the parent bus to look for the next
> ACS test.
To make sure I understand the problem here, I
On 8/4/12 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
(bus->self == NULL). SR-IOV can generate such buses. When
we find these, skip to the parent bus to look for the next
ACS test.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson
---
David Ahern reported an oops
On 8/4/12 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
(bus-self == NULL). SR-IOV can generate such buses. When
we find these, skip to the parent bus to look for the next
ACS test.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com
---
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
(bus-self == NULL). SR-IOV can generate such buses. When
we find these, skip to the parent bus to look for the next
ACS test.
To make sure I understand
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 23:30 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
(bus-self == NULL). SR-IOV can generate such buses. When
we find these, skip to the parent
It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
(bus->self == NULL). SR-IOV can generate such buses. When
we find these, skip to the parent bus to look for the next
ACS test.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson
---
David Ahern reported an oops from iommu drivers passing NULL into
this
It's possible to have buses without an associated bridge
(bus-self == NULL). SR-IOV can generate such buses. When
we find these, skip to the parent bus to look for the next
ACS test.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com
---
David Ahern reported an oops from iommu drivers
20 matches
Mail list logo