On Thursday 11 August 2016 05:57 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Sorry, found it in my inbox while clearing out backlog..
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:31:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
we loop through the mask using
On Thursday 11 August 2016 05:57 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Sorry, found it in my inbox while clearing out backlog..
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:31:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
we loop through the mask using
Sorry, found it in my inbox while clearing out backlog..
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:31:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
> we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
> While the exisitng code
Sorry, found it in my inbox while clearing out backlog..
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:31:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
> we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
> While the exisitng code
Em Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:19:06AM +0300, Yury Norov escreveu:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:31:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> > When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
> > we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
> > While the
Em Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:19:06AM +0300, Yury Norov escreveu:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:31:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> > When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
> > we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
> > While the
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:31:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
> we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
> While the exisitng code works fine in most of the case,
> the logic is broken for
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:31:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
> we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
> While the exisitng code works fine in most of the case,
> the logic is broken for
When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
While the exisitng code works fine in most of the case,
the logic is broken for 32bit kernel (Big Endian).
When reading u64 mask using (u32 *)()[0],
When decoding the perf_regs mask in perf_output_sample_regs(),
we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
While the exisitng code works fine in most of the case,
the logic is broken for 32bit kernel (Big Endian).
When reading u64 mask using (u32 *)()[0],
10 matches
Mail list logo