On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 17:38 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> >
> > Added one missing Haswell model.
> Indeed, but when I compare with the table in events/intel/core.c I
> find
> we also miss one Broadwell (86) model.
>
> Would
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 17:38 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> >
> > Added one missing Haswell model.
> Indeed, but when I compare with the table in events/intel/core.c I
> find
> we also miss one Broadwell (86) model.
>
> Would
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Added one missing Haswell model.
Indeed, but when I compare with the table in events/intel/core.c I find
we also miss one Broadwell (86) model.
Would the below be correct for that?
---
arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 13
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Added one missing Haswell model.
Indeed, but when I compare with the table in events/intel/core.c I find
we also miss one Broadwell (86) model.
Would the below be correct for that?
---
arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 13
Added one missing Haswell model.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada
---
arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
index 70c93f9..c83c141 100644
---
Added one missing Haswell model.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada
---
arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
index 70c93f9..c83c141 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
+++
6 matches
Mail list logo