Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > >> > * Vaishali Thakkar wrote: >> > >> >> Ping! >> > >> > Pong. This patch is already upstream. >> >> Oops! Sorry. I just realized that you already

Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

* Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > > > >> Ping! > > > > Pong. This patch is already upstream. > > Oops! Sorry. I just realized that you already applied it but it is > still showing me in linux-next > when grepped

Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > >> Ping! > > Pong. This patch is already upstream. Oops! Sorry. I just realized that you already applied it but it is still showing me in linux-next when grepped for it and is blocking the road in removing the

Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

* Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > Ping! Pong. This patch is already upstream. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

* Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > Ping! Pong. This patch is already upstream. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > >> Ping! > > Pong. This patch is already upstream. Oops! Sorry. I just realized that you already applied it but it is still showing me in linux-next when grepped for it

Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

* Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > > > >> Ping! > > > > Pong. This patch is already upstream. > > Oops! Sorry. I just realized that you already

Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > >> > * Vaishali Thakkar wrote: >> > >> >> Ping! >> > >> > Pong. This

Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

Ping! On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > Macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE is deprecated. So, here use > struct pci_device_id instead of DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE with > the goal of getting rid of this macro completely. > > The Coccinelle semantic patch that performs this

Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

Ping! On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > Macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE is deprecated. So, here use > struct pci_device_id instead of DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE with > the goal of getting rid of this macro completely. > > The Coccinelle semantic patch

[PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

Macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE is deprecated. So, here use struct pci_device_id instead of DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE with the goal of getting rid of this macro completely. The Coccinelle semantic patch that performs this transformation is as follows: @@ identifier a; declarer name

[PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE

Macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE is deprecated. So, here use struct pci_device_id instead of DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE with the goal of getting rid of this macro completely. The Coccinelle semantic patch that performs this transformation is as follows: @@ identifier a; declarer name