perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the
data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets
were both 37. These are distinct fields, and the bitfield layout
in perf_mem_data_src confirms that SNOOPX should be at offset 38.
Fixes: 52839e653b5629bd ("perf tools: Add
bit as it fixes the tooling,
> > > please consider taking the kernel part.
> >
> > Al, can you resend with the right people on Cc? Also see below.
> >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > From: Al Grant
> > > Subject: [PATCH] perf: correc
ct the
> tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h bit as it fixes the tooling,
> please consider taking the kernel part.
Al, can you resend with the right people on Cc? Also see below.
> ---
>
> From: Al Grant
> Subject: [PATCH] perf: correct SNOOPX field offset
> Message-ID:
Cc? Also see below.
>
> > ---
> >
> > From: Al Grant
> > Subject: [PATCH] perf: correct SNOOPX field offset
> > Message-ID: <9974f2d0-bf7f-518e-d9f7-4520e5ff1...@foss.arm.com>
> > Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:28:34 +0100
> >
> > perf_ev
On 01/09/2020 16:02, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Al Grant escreveu:
On 26/08/2020 15:26, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:43AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote:
pe
t; well.
Also you mixed up tools/ with include/ things, the perf part of the
kernel is maintained by Ingo, PeterZ.
Peter, the patch is the one below, I'll collect the
tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h bit as it fixes the tooling,
please consider taking the kernel part.
Thanks,
- A
Em Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Al Grant escreveu:
> On 26/08/2020 15:26, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:43AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote:
> > > > perf_event.h has macros that define the fiel
On 26/08/2020 15:26, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:43AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote:
perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the
data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offs
Em Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:43AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote:
> > perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the
> > data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets
> > were both 37. These are distinct fields
Hi,
[ adding the kernel-side perf maintainers ]
Please note that scripts/get_maintainer.pl can help to find relevant
maintainers.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote:
> perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the
> data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOP
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote:
> perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the
> data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets
> were both 37. These are distinct fields, and the bitfield layout
> in perf_mem_data_src confirms that SNOOPX s
perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the
data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets
were both 37. These are distinct fields, and the bitfield layout
in perf_mem_data_src confirms that SNOOPX should be at offset 38.
From: Al Grant
include/uapi/linux/perf
12 matches
Mail list logo
