Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

2017-06-05 Thread Thomas-Mich Richter
On 06/02/2017 04:11 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: [] >> >> If you have specific patches in Jiri's branch that you think are good to >> go, just point me to them and I'll cherry-pick them. >> >> I'm looking now at the one you pointed out above (070b9644981e). > > Just looked, but the cs

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

2017-06-04 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:11:05AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: SNIP > > > > > > I suggest we should move the discussion to the linux-perf-users > > > mailing list. > > > > > > Your thoughts? > > > > If you have specific patches in Jiri's branch that you think are good to > > go, jus

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

2017-06-04 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote: SNBIP > > I started fixing it some time ago, but got distracted, if you are > > interested, you're welcome to pick up from my branch ;-) > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git > > perf/attr_tes

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

2017-06-02 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:09:36AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu: > > On 06/01/2017 11:04 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:20:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > >> Em Thu, Jun 01,

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

2017-06-02 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu: > On 06/01/2017 11:04 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:20:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >> Em Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:34:41PM +0200, Thomas Richter escreveu: > >>> Command perf test -v 14 (Set

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

2017-06-02 Thread Thomas-Mich Richter
On 06/01/2017 11:04 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:20:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> Em Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:34:41PM +0200, Thomas Richter escreveu: >>> Command perf test -v 14 (Setup struct perf_event_attr test) >>> always reports success even if the test case

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

2017-06-01 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:20:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:34:41PM +0200, Thomas Richter escreveu: > > Command perf test -v 14 (Setup struct perf_event_attr test) > > always reports success even if the test case fails. > > It works correctly if you also s

Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

2017-06-01 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:34:41PM +0200, Thomas Richter escreveu: > Command perf test -v 14 (Setup struct perf_event_attr test) > always reports success even if the test case fails. > It works correctly if you also specify -F (for don't fork). Thanks for working on this, adding Jiri Olsa, that wr

[PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

2017-06-01 Thread Thomas Richter
Command perf test -v 14 (Setup struct perf_event_attr test) always reports success even if the test case fails. It works correctly if you also specify -F (for don't fork). root@s35lp76 perf]# ./perf test -v 14 14: Setup struct perf_event_attr : --- start --- running './te