Hi Arnaldo,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 2:30 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> Em Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 04:45:57PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 02:43:56PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > It didn't check the tool->cgroup_events bit which is set when
> > > the --all-cgrou
Hi Jiri,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 12:46 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 02:43:56PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > It didn't check the tool->cgroup_events bit which is set when
> > the --all-cgroups option is given. Without it, samples will not have
> > cgroup info so no reason to
Em Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 04:45:57PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 02:43:56PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > It didn't check the tool->cgroup_events bit which is set when
> > the --all-cgroups option is given. Without it, samples will not have
> > cgroup info so no reason to s
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 02:43:56PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> It didn't check the tool->cgroup_events bit which is set when
> the --all-cgroups option is given. Without it, samples will not have
> cgroup info so no reason to synthesize.
>
> We can check the PERF_RECORD_CGROUP records after runn
It didn't check the tool->cgroup_events bit which is set when
the --all-cgroups option is given. Without it, samples will not have
cgroup info so no reason to synthesize.
We can check the PERF_RECORD_CGROUP records after running perf record
*WITHOUT* the --all-cgroups option:
Before:
$ perf re
5 matches
Mail list logo