Hi Jiri,
On 4/29/2020 4:16 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:19:22PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
I wonder this would break some expectations.. would it be
more safe to detect duration event and bypass it from the
decission? but maybe the case I'm worried about is not a
problem at all
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:19:22PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I wonder this would break some expectations.. would it be
> > more safe to detect duration event and bypass it from the
> > decission? but maybe the case I'm worried about is not a
> > problem at all.. Andi?
>
> Don't see what it woul
> I wonder this would break some expectations.. would it be
> more safe to detect duration event and bypass it from the
> decission? but maybe the case I'm worried about is not a
> problem at all.. Andi?
Don't see what it would break.
Yes maybe we need to special case duration_time more, but that
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:41:16PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
SNIP
> index 9207b6c45475..b01ee06b1965 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -1841,8 +1841,8 @@ static void setup_system_wide(int forks)
>* conditions is met:
>*
>* - ther
4 matches
Mail list logo
