On 02/09/15 22:55, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:00:08PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> On 18/08/15 12:07, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> In a couple of cases the 'comm' member of 'union event' has
>>> been used instead of the correct member ('fork') when processing
>>>
Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:00:08PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 18/08/15 12:07, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > In a couple of cases the 'comm' member of 'union event' has
> > been used instead of the correct member ('fork') when processing
> > exit events.
> >
> > In the cases where it has been u
On 18/08/15 12:07, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> In a couple of cases the 'comm' member of 'union event' has
> been used instead of the correct member ('fork') when processing
> exit events.
>
> In the cases where it has been used incorrectly, only the 'pid'
> and 'tid' are affected. The 'pid' value wou
In a couple of cases the 'comm' member of 'union event' has
been used instead of the correct member ('fork') when processing
exit events.
In the cases where it has been used incorrectly, only the 'pid'
and 'tid' are affected. The 'pid' value would be correct anyway
because it is in the same posit
4 matches
Mail list logo