On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 10:26:42 +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Do you know about the support of AARCH64, both in 64-bit and 32-bit
> (compat) mode?
> I would be glad to give it a try.
Please move this topic to:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
aarch64 elfutils port
Hi,
On 18 November 2013 21:16, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:49:45 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> I think it's an option.. but it'll simpler to try the libdw
>> interface first and see if it's good/fast enough..
>
> The elfutils libdw unwinder is being upstreamed these weeks, the x86
Hi,
On 18 November 2013 13:59, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
> Em Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:46:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
>> btw., here's some 'perf top' call graph performance and profiling
>> quality feedback, with the latest perf code:
>>
>> 'perf top --call-graph fp' now works very wel
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:49:45 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> I think it's an option.. but it'll simpler to try the libdw
> interface first and see if it's good/fast enough..
The elfutils libdw unwinder is being upstreamed these weeks, the x86* unwinder
itself is already upstream now.
> also I recall d
* Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:26:53PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Em Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:46:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > > > > btw., here's some
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:26:53PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:46:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > > > btw., here's some 'perf top' call graph performance an
* Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:46:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > > btw., here's some 'perf top' call graph performance and profiling
> > > quality feedback, with the latest perf code:
> > >
>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:46:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > btw., here's some 'perf top' call graph performance and profiling
> > quality feedback, with the latest perf code:
> >
> > 'perf top --call-graph fp' now
Em Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:46:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> btw., here's some 'perf top' call graph performance and profiling
> quality feedback, with the latest perf code:
>
> 'perf top --call-graph fp' now works very well, using just 0.2%
> of CPU time on a fast system:
>
> 4676 mingo
btw., here's some 'perf top' call graph performance and profiling
quality feedback, with the latest perf code:
'perf top --call-graph fp' now works very well, using just 0.2%
of CPU time on a fast system:
4676 mingo 20 0 612m 56m 9948 S 1 0.2 0:00.68 perf
* David Ahern wrote:
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> @@ -143,12 +142,12 @@ Default is to monitor all CPUS.
> --asm-raw::
> Show raw instruction encoding of assembly instructions.
>
> --G::
> +-g::
> Enables call-graph (
In most commands -g is used for callchains. Make perf-top follow suit.
Move group to just --group with no short cut making it similar to
perf-record.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Namhyung Kim
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt |
12 matches
Mail list logo