Re: [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-06 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Wednesday 05 April 2017 04:22 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 04/05/2017 12:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> On Sunday 02 April 2017 10:25 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> From: Rafał Miłecki >>> >>> So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally >>>

Re: [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-06 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Wednesday 05 April 2017 04:22 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 04/05/2017 12:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> On Sunday 02 April 2017 10:25 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> From: Rafał Miłecki >>> >>> So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally >>> magic values.

Re: [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-05 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 04/05/2017 12:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: On Sunday 02 April 2017 10:25 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: From: Rafał Miłecki So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally magic values. There was some pattern there but it wasn't clear what is it

Re: [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-05 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 04/05/2017 12:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: On Sunday 02 April 2017 10:25 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: From: Rafał Miłecki So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally magic values. There was some pattern there but it wasn't clear what is it about. Thanks to the

Re: [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-05 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Sunday 02 April 2017 10:25 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally > magic values. There was some pattern there but it wasn't clear what is > it about. > > Thanks to the patch submitted by

Re: [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-05 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Sunday 02 April 2017 10:25 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally > magic values. There was some pattern there but it wasn't clear what is > it about. > > Thanks to the patch submitted by Broadcom: > [PATCH

Re: [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-02 Thread Jon Mason
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally > magic values. There was some pattern there but it wasn't clear what is > it about. > > Thanks to the patch

Re: [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-02 Thread Jon Mason
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally > magic values. There was some pattern there but it wasn't clear what is > it about. > > Thanks to the patch submitted by Broadcom: > [PATCH 5/6]

[PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-02 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally magic values. There was some pattern there but it wasn't clear what is it about. Thanks to the patch submitted by Broadcom: [PATCH 5/6] phy: Add USB3 PHY support for Broadcom NSP SoC and

[PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: split all writes into reg & val pairs

2017-04-02 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki So far all the PHY initialization was implemented using some totally magic values. There was some pattern there but it wasn't clear what is it about. Thanks to the patch submitted by Broadcom: [PATCH 5/6] phy: Add USB3 PHY support for Broadcom NSP SoC and the upstream