On 11/17/2020 5:45 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Do you have the Marvell PHY driver either built-in or available as a
>>> module? I suspect the problem is you don't. You will need the Marvell
>>> PHY driver to correctly drive the PHY, you can't rely on the fallback
>>> driver for SFPs.
>> Correct.
> > Do you have the Marvell PHY driver either built-in or available as a
> > module? I suspect the problem is you don't. You will need the Marvell
> > PHY driver to correctly drive the PHY, you can't rely on the fallback
> > driver for SFPs.
> Correct. I was using the generic driver and that does
Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
>>
>> Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
>
> Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
> >>
> >> Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:06:42AM +0100, Bjarni
Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
>>
>> Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:06:42AM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
>> >> There is an issue with the current phylink driver and CuSFPs
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
>
> Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:06:42AM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
> >> There is an issue with the current phylink driver and CuSFPs which
> >> results in a callback to the phylink
Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:06:42AM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
>> There is an issue with the current phylink driver and CuSFPs which
>> results in a callback to the phylink validate function without any
>> advertisement capabilities. The workaround
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:06:42AM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
> There is an issue with the current phylink driver and CuSFPs which
> results in a callback to the phylink validate function without any
> advertisement capabilities. The workaround (in this changeset)
> is to assign capabilities
There is an issue with the current phylink driver and CuSFPs which
results in a callback to the phylink validate function without any
advertisement capabilities. The workaround (in this changeset)
is to assign capabilities if a 1000baseT SFP is identified.
Signed-off-by: Bjarni Jonasson
---
9 matches
Mail list logo