Hello!
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergei Shtylyov
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 6:04 PM
>
> Hello!
>
> On 3/13/2017 9:24 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
>
> > This patch fixes an issue that this driver doesn't take care of the runtime
> > PM. This code assumed that devm_phy_create()
Hello!
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergei Shtylyov
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 6:04 PM
>
> Hello!
>
> On 3/13/2017 9:24 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
>
> > This patch fixes an issue that this driver doesn't take care of the runtime
> > PM. This code assumed that devm_phy_create()
Hello!
On 3/13/2017 9:24 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
This patch fixes an issue that this driver doesn't take care of the runtime
PM. This code assumed that devm_phy_create() called pm_runtime_enable(dev),
but it misunderstood the dev_phy_create()'s specification.
This driver should call the
Hello!
On 3/13/2017 9:24 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
This patch fixes an issue that this driver doesn't take care of the runtime
PM. This code assumed that devm_phy_create() called pm_runtime_enable(dev),
but it misunderstood the dev_phy_create()'s specification.
This driver should call the
This patch fixes an issue that this driver doesn't take care of the runtime
PM. This code assumed that devm_phy_create() called pm_runtime_enable(dev),
but it misunderstood the dev_phy_create()'s specification.
This driver should call the own pm_runtime_pm() before dev_phy_create().
Fixes:
This patch fixes an issue that this driver doesn't take care of the runtime
PM. This code assumed that devm_phy_create() called pm_runtime_enable(dev),
but it misunderstood the dev_phy_create()'s specification.
This driver should call the own pm_runtime_pm() before dev_phy_create().
Fixes:
6 matches
Mail list logo