Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

2019-07-22 Thread Doug Anderson
Kishon, On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:22 AM Doug Anderson wrote: > > Kishon, > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:22 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 20/05/19 1:34 PM, Caesar Wang wrote: > > > Hi Doug, > > > > > > For now, nobody of rockchip is responsible for this driver. > > > Cc:

Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

2019-06-03 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:22 AM Doug Anderson wrote: > > Can someone in Rockchip try to find the root-cause of the issue? Keeping the > > PHY off shouldn't increase power draw. > > It sounded like Chris already answered this, though? Basically things Doh! Don't know why I said Chris when

Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

2019-06-03 Thread Doug Anderson
Kishon, On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:22 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Hi, > > On 20/05/19 1:34 PM, Caesar Wang wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > > > For now, nobody of rockchip is responsible for this driver. > > Cc: Nickey, Zain, Hjc > > > > > > On 5/8/19 7:48 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote: > >> While

Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

2019-06-03 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On 20/05/19 1:34 PM, Caesar Wang wrote: > Hi Doug, > > For now,  nobody of rockchip is responsible for this driver. > Cc: Nickey, Zain, Hjc > > > On 5/8/19 7:48 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote: >> While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that >> the power draw in suspend

Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

2019-05-20 Thread Caesar Wang
Hi Doug, For now,  nobody of rockchip is responsible for this driver. Cc: Nickey, Zain, Hjc On 5/8/19 7:48 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote: While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that the power draw in suspend was higher on newer kernels compared to the downstream Chrome

Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

2019-05-18 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:51 AM Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2019, 01:57:47 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson: > > Elaine and Caesar, > > > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:50 PM Douglas Anderson > > wrote: > > > > > > While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I

Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

2019-05-18 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Hi, Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2019, 01:57:47 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson: > Elaine and Caesar, > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:50 PM Douglas Anderson wrote: > > > > While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that > > the power draw in suspend was higher on newer kernels compared to

Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

2019-05-17 Thread Doug Anderson
Elaine and Caesar, On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:50 PM Douglas Anderson wrote: > > While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that > the power draw in suspend was higher on newer kernels compared to the > downstream Chrome OS 3.14 kernel. Specifically the power of an >

[PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

2019-05-07 Thread Douglas Anderson
While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that the power draw in suspend was higher on newer kernels compared to the downstream Chrome OS 3.14 kernel. Specifically the power of an rk3288-veyron-jerry board that I tested (as measured by the smart battery) was ~16 mA on