Kishon,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:22 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Kishon,
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:22 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 20/05/19 1:34 PM, Caesar Wang wrote:
> > > Hi Doug,
> > >
> > > For now, nobody of rockchip is responsible for this driver.
> > > Cc:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:22 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Can someone in Rockchip try to find the root-cause of the issue? Keeping the
> > PHY off shouldn't increase power draw.
>
> It sounded like Chris already answered this, though? Basically things
Doh! Don't know why I said Chris when
Kishon,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:22 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 20/05/19 1:34 PM, Caesar Wang wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > For now, nobody of rockchip is responsible for this driver.
> > Cc: Nickey, Zain, Hjc
> >
> >
> > On 5/8/19 7:48 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> >> While
Hi,
On 20/05/19 1:34 PM, Caesar Wang wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> For now, nobody of rockchip is responsible for this driver.
> Cc: Nickey, Zain, Hjc
>
>
> On 5/8/19 7:48 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>> While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that
>> the power draw in suspend
Hi Doug,
For now, nobody of rockchip is responsible for this driver.
Cc: Nickey, Zain, Hjc
On 5/8/19 7:48 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that
the power draw in suspend was higher on newer kernels compared to the
downstream Chrome
Hi,
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:51 AM Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2019, 01:57:47 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson:
> > Elaine and Caesar,
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:50 PM Douglas Anderson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I
Hi,
Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2019, 01:57:47 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Elaine and Caesar,
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:50 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
> >
> > While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that
> > the power draw in suspend was higher on newer kernels compared to
Elaine and Caesar,
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:50 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that
> the power draw in suspend was higher on newer kernels compared to the
> downstream Chrome OS 3.14 kernel. Specifically the power of an
>
While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that
the power draw in suspend was higher on newer kernels compared to the
downstream Chrome OS 3.14 kernel. Specifically the power of an
rk3288-veyron-jerry board that I tested (as measured by the smart
battery) was ~16 mA on
9 matches
Mail list logo