* Linus Walleij [120714 13:21]:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > OK so no comments for a while. Here's the patch updated to leave out
> > the comments in the binding example.
>
> I reason like this:
>
> - My fears is that the code gets hopeless to understand the
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [120714 13:21]:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
OK so no comments for a while. Here's the patch updated to leave out
the comments in the binding example.
I reason like this:
- My fears is that the code
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> OK so no comments for a while. Here's the patch updated to leave out
> the comments in the binding example.
I reason like this:
- My fears is that the code gets hopeless to understand the mux, the
only way to understand that aspect of
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
OK so no comments for a while. Here's the patch updated to leave out
the comments in the binding example.
I reason like this:
- My fears is that the code gets hopeless to understand the mux, the
only way to understand
* Tony Lindgren [120627 03:37]:
> * Stephen Warren [120626 10:10]:
> > On 06/26/2012 07:43 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > ...
> > > Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: Add one-register-per-pin type device tree based
> > > pinctrl driver
> > >
> > > Add
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120627 03:37]:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120626 10:10]:
On 06/26/2012 07:43 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
...
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: Add one-register-per-pin type device tree based
pinctrl driver
Add one-register-per-pin type device
6 matches
Mail list logo
